Phillipine Literary Periods - 3839 Words

INTRODUCTON Philippine literature is the literature associated with the Philippines and includes the legends of prehistory, and the colonial legacy of the Philippines. Most of the notable literature of the Philippines was written during the Spanish period and the first half of the 20th century in Spanish language. Philippine literature is written in Spanish, English, Tagalog, and/or other native Philippine language. DEFINITION OF LITERATURE The word literature is derived from the Latin term Litera which means letter. It has been defined by various writers. Because literature deals with ideas, thoughts and emotions of man, literature can be said to be the story of man. Man’s loves, griefs, thoughts, dreams, and aspirations coached†¦show more content†¦The most popular was â€Å"Ang Mahal na Passion ni Jesu Cristong Panignoon Natin† by Aguino de Belen b. Senakulo – dramatization of the pasyon, it shows the passion and death of Christ 2. Secular (non-religious) Literature a. Awit - colorful tales of chivalry made for singing and chanting Example: Ibong Adarna b. Korido – metrical tale written in octosyllabic quatrains Example: Florante at Laura by Francisco Baltazar c. Prose Narratives – written to prescribe proper decorum i. Dialogo iii. ejemplo ii. Manual de Urbanidad iv. tratado Examples: Modesto de Castros Pagsusulatan ng Dalawang Binibini na si Urbana at si Feliza and Joaquin Tuasons Ang Bagong Robinson (The New Robinson) in 1879 III. NATIONALISTIC / PROPAGANDA AND REVOLUTIONARY PERIOD (1864 – 1896) A. Characteristics 1. Planted seeds of nationalism in Filipinos 2. Language shifted from Spanish to Tagalog 3. Addressed the masses instead of the â€Å"intelligentsia† B. Literary Forms 1. Propaganda Literature - Reformatory in objective a. Political Essays – satires, editorials and news articles were written to attack and expose the evils of Spanish rule i. Diariong Tagalog – founded by Marcelo del Pilar ii. La Solidaridad – whose editor-in-chief is Graciano Lopez-Jaena b. Political Novels i. Noli Me Tangere andShow MoreRelatedStarbucks Entry to China10678 Words   |  43 Pagesfor one reason: They loved coffee and tea and wanted Seattle to have access to the best.†5 Starbucks stood not only for good quality coffee, especially dark-roasted coffee, but also sought out to educate its customers about their product. Jerry, a literary lover, named the company Starbucks, after the first mate in Moby Dick, because it â€Å"evoked the romance of the high seas and the seafaring tradition of early coffee traders.† The original store did not brew and sell coffee by the cup, but instead offeredRead MoreStarbucks Entry t o China10685 Words   |  43 Pagesfor one reason: They loved coffee and tea and wanted Seattle to have access to the best.†5 Starbucks stood not only for good quality coffee, especially dark-roasted coffee, but also sought out to educate its customers about their product. Jerry, a literary lover, named the company Starbucks, after the first mate in Moby Dick, because it â€Å"evoked the romance of the high seas and the seafaring tradition of early coffee traders.† The original store did not brew and sell coffee by the cup, but instead offered

Analysis Of Shakespeare s Oedipus Rex - 1442 Words

Most people who have had a classical education or ever ingested any media in their lifetime have likely heard the name, Shakespeare. A true mogul of the Elizabethan Theatre era, Shakespeare has written 37 plays and over 154 sonnets that are still performed on stages today. Similarly, anyone who has ever picked up a book has read about Sigmund Freud or some of his theories. Freud established many of the modern practices used in psychiatry and taught in psychology classes worldwide. Freud is a pioneer of psychology just as Shakespeare is to literature and theatre. They are two of the greatest minds our world knows, but how are these vastly different scholars related? Freud’s theories are not always held in high regard, specifically, The†¦show more content†¦Perhaps Hamlet prefers if it was him in his uncle’s place. With all the evidence, it is almost as if Shakespeare was hinting at Hamlet’s oedipal maternal desires. His attitude and state of mind througho ut the story can be attributed to how he feels about his mother remarrying. For example, Hamlet is sulking around in a black cloak as he questions why ``[Gertrude] would hang on [Claudius]/ As if increase of appetite had grown/ By what it fed on† (I.ii.347-348). He is very clearly expressing verbally how upset he is when pondering his mother and her new lover, but he is also expressing it physically by wearing black even though his father is â€Å"But two months dead† (I.ii.342). Hamlet’s grieving period is over and therefore has no need to wear black anymore. He is wearing black and sulking now because he is grieving his mother s love. For she has moved on and found a new man to bed, thus jealousy ensues. This is something that happens frequently when a new alpha male enters a relationship dynamic, parental or sexual. More evidence of his inappropriate maternal love is shown by the way he treats Ophelia. It is said by Freud and other psychologists that the relat ionship you have with your lover mirrors the relationship you have with your parental figures. It is no coincidence that the way he batters her with his word and destroys her conscious relates more to the relationship with his mother than that with Ophelia. â€Å"The power of beauty willShow MoreRelated A Freudian Reading of Hamlet and Titus Andronicus Essay2542 Words   |  11 Pagesslips of the tongue) and jokes, and it is evident that psychoanalysis asks us to pay a lot of attention to language, in puns, slips of the tongue etc. This suggests how psychoanalysis is directly related to literary criticism, since both kinds of analysis focus on close readings of language. Therefore, by understanding Freudian theory, we can gain a deeper understanding of literature. This essay attempts to discover how Freud’s psychoanalytical accounts of human nature can bring us to a deeperRead MoreSeminar: Literary Theory Applied to H.P. Lovecraft-Notably â€Å"the Beast in the Cave†6821 Words   |  28 PagesBuena VistA university | A Theoretical Analysis of H.P. Lovecraft’s â€Å"Beast in the Cave† | Senior Seminar | | Cory J. Dahlstrom | 7/28/2012 | H.P. Lovecraft has been called â€Å"one of the best, worst authors of our century.† In the following paper, I will explore his earliest work, â€Å"The Beast in the Cave,† a story written when he was around fifteen years old. I will explore its meanings and context through the lenses of reader response, deconstructionism, newRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesbuilt-in pretests and posttests, focus on what you need to learn and to review in order to succeed. Visit www.mymanagementlab.com to learn more. DEVELOPING MANAGEMENT SKILLS EIGHTH EDITION David A. Whetten BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Kim S. Cameron UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Prentice Hall Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Upper Saddle River Amsterdam Cape Town Dubai London Madrid Milan Munich Paris Montreal Toronto Delhi Mexico City Sao Paulo Sydney Hong Kong Seoul Singapore

Informative essay/Weight training free essay sample

Informative Essay Overtraining Do you like the saying of no days off? Ever heard the statement rest is for the weak? You might have even heard that the more you work out the better results youll get. You may push your self to the limit every time you work out, but ever think of giving your body a rest week to recover? Most athletes know that getting enough rest after exercise is essential to high-level performance, but many still over train and feel remorseful when they take a day off. People need to know that that rest is important. They need to discover how beneficial rest is for your body when training. There is even a proper rest period between sets when weight training. The body repairs and strengthens itself in the time between workouts, and through rest days. Continuous training without rest can actually weaken the strongest athletes. Rest is more important than you think. We will write a custom essay sample on Informative essay/Weight training or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page According to Shape. com there are nine main reason why sometimes skipping your workout could actually be Just as important as going to the gym that day; its time to take a workout timeout. While its important to work your muscles and stimulate muscle-building proteins, its equally as important o give your body enough time to recover. The main reason is why a rest day is the best day is lifting weights creates tiny tears in your muscles. You break down your body when you train. miour energy stores are depleted, your muscles and other tissues are broken down and your body is in a worn-out state. (Rest and Recovery) When you give your body a day to rest and recuperate your muscles repair and heal during that rest period. This repair process is what makes your muscles stronger. It allows your body and mind to recapture what it has lost when working out. Rest days llow your body to rejuvenate mentally, physically and psychologically. Each muscle you exercise needs a certain type of rest. Your whole body needs rest in general; if rest for the entire body does not happen large amounts of stress can build up and leading the body into an over-trained state. Some ways to make sure your body gets enough rest are to schedule rest weeks. One whole week of rest every 4-5 weeks is great for your body. Youll gain more strength by scaling back your lifting routine one week each month. In the 3-month study, men who halved their training volume the inal week of each month boosted their strength by 29 percent. (Shape Magazine) If you absolutely have to go to the gym, take it easy, do fewer reps in your workouts, and preform less intense workouts this will leave your body feeling more refreshed and awake after your workout. Rest between sets in your workout is Just as important as taking a week off in your training. The amount of time you rest between sets can have a major impact on the exercise youre doing affects your body. Re st too long and your workouts lose intensity; rest too little and you burn out too quickly. Lippincott Williams Wilkins studies have found that testosterone are produced in higher levels when you allow your body to rest for a short interval of time during sets to get the boost you want. There are many theories on how much rest is recommended between weight lifting sets and the different time allowed to focus on the purpose of your workout. The amount of rest right after your first and last rep for some is all a matter of preference. It depends on what your concentration is on in your workout. For example short period of time, 30 seconds, allow your body minimal time to rest but ncreases the intensity of your workout. Short time will focus on high velocity workouts, fat burning and muscle memory. Other theories are letting your body have a full 60 seconds of rest between sets for more powerful heavy lifting training to increase, size, strength and power rather than muscles endurance and stamina. Some myths about rest weeks; days off, and in-between set resting have a lot of people believing incorrect facts of the issue at hand. Ideas such as there is no such thing as a day off or you have to continuously go from exercise to exercise to get the esults you want are some of the basic myths that people perceive to rookies in the weight room today. Incorrect information would be that you have to constantly workout to see any type or results; it is assumed that if hard training builds muscle, then training as hard as humanly possible must build the most muscle. These are all myths about weight lifting. There are many things about weightlifting that people are uninformed about. It is important to know correct information, so you can do what is best for your body, and not injure yourself. It is vital to let your body rest and epair itself for its next workout. Dont over-do it, and be conscious of what your body is telling you.

Ricardo`s Theory Of Value Essays - Value Theory, Economic Theories

Ricardo`s Theory Of Value One of the enduring questions of economics is "Where do profits come from?" One of the ways in which economic philosophers have tried to answer it is by first answering the question of value. At the center of most economic paradigms is a Theory of Value. The classical political economists found value to be determined in production; since most of the cost of production could be reduced to labour, this approach was refined into The Labour Theory of Value. Neoclassical economists looked for value in the market act of exchange and developed the Marginal Theory of Value. Both of these theories are currently under challenge by the post-Keynesians with their Sraffian Theory of Value, which, like the labour theory of value, is based on production rather than exchange. Any theory of value in economics is an extremely abstract formulation: in fact, value theory is the major intersection between economics and philosophy. For millennia, literally, scholars and theorists have tried to deduce how items attained their 'value'. From pre-Christian to pre-Keynesian times, various strands of thought have proposed (often divergent) explanations for this phenomenon. For instance, economists sometimes use the term "theory of value" to mean quite different things. Here, the term is used to denote a theory that attempts to explain long-run prices in a capitalist economy. But there are also theories of value which attempt to explain what prices should be. Medieval scholars used the concept of just price, which was the price that would allow the producer to earn a living appropriate to his social position. Some Institutionalists have introduced similar concepts - such as normative value or reasonable value. Whatever their explanations, theories of value are at the heart of two of the major themes: i-) the distribution of wealth and income; and ii-)the maintenance of microeconomic order. A Brief History of Value Theory The debate on the theory of value, which was initiated in Ancient Greece and which became inactive during the Middle Ages, later re-emerged at the close of the seventeenth century to dominate economic thought for the next 200 years. Even today its primary importance is such that Schumpeter claimed that "the problem of value must always hold the pivotal position, as the chief tool of analysis in any pure theory that works with a rational schema." Similar hypothetical solutions varied from time to time. Considering that this piece is hyperbolic in scope, shall, I would narrow down the analysis to the following structure. Firstly, I would try to overview sketching Aristotelian, Scholastic and Mercantilistic views on value. Secondly, I will follow an analysis of the contribution of pre-classicalist writers like Petty, Cantillon, Galiani and Law to the debate. Thirdly, the supply oriented theory of value put forward by classical economists like Smith, Ricardo, Marx and Mill shall be examined. Fourthly, Jevons and Mengers' neo-classical attempt to replace the classicalists with their demand-oriented theory of value will be considered. Finally, both Walras' and Marshall's respective resolution to the conflict shall be investigated by individually accommodating the interactions of both supply and demand as determinants of value within their overall economic framework. Early Economic Thought The first great landmark in the long and tortuous intellectual struggle with the riddle of value, was laid by the philosophers of the Athenian Academy in the 4th century BC. It was Aristotle (384-322) who held that the source of value was based on need, without which exchange would not take place. Originally, it was he who distinguished between value in use and value in exchange- "Of everything which we possess, there are two uses; For example a shoe is used for wear and it is used for exchange". While the Scholastics later adopted and accommodated these views to Christian thought, like the Aristotelian philosophers before them, economics was not regarded as an independent discipline but merely as an integral part of ethical and moral philosophy. As a result, the debate on value was centred and henceforth retarded by a normative approach - what value should 'justly' be, instead of what actually is. During this period, utility was widely held as the determinant of value with only a minority of theorists such as St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) and John Duns Scotus (1265-1308) taking note of the cost of the production side. The search concerning value was continued in the direction of utility by early mercantilists during the 16th and the first half of the 17th century. The supremacy of this argument was highlighted in 1588 when Bernardo Davanzati unsuccessfully attempted to construct a utility theory of value in Lecture On Money.